Winnie-the-Pooh never had his books made illegal or taken away. In fact, all he could do for a week was listen to the Christopher Robin read books. He preferred honey for eating but he wanted his books and stories for nourishment which sustained him in another way during his time of "great tightness":
"....'A week!' said Pooh gloomily. 'What about meals?' . . . 'I'm afraid no meals,' said Christopher Robin . . . but we will read to you.' Pooh began to sigh, and then found he couldn't because he was so tightly stuck; and a tear rolled down his eye, as he said: 'Then would you read a Sustaining Book, such as would help and comfort a Wedged Bear in Great Tightness?' So for a week Christopher Robin read that sort of book at the North end of Pooh...." Pooh Goes Visiting, my 1961 copy of Winnie-the-Pooh by A. A. Milne, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc.
Now, more and more children are dealing with their own "great tightness" of inner, personal struggles from threats of and/or real monetary and job loss of their parents, for the day-to-day loss of needs, security and comforts in their family life. Not by their own design or fault they have become "wedged children in great, great, great tightness" as the threats and actual losses press in on them with great weight. Yet,
our government has decided that another loss is necessary for the children so that they can be protected -- all pre-1985 books are hazardous for them, must be kept from them, and are illegal to sell because of possible harm from lead content. Books for the purpose of reading and learning instead of physically chewing or eating.
Sequestering their favorite pre-1985 books means that the
books will no longer be on the library shelves to borrow or found at a used resell book store to purchase. Many
homeschool curriculum distributors will not have these books to supplement their curriculum and
homeschool used book sellers will not be able to sell these books. Garage and rummage sales will be different with no books (and children's clothing & toys). Most of the
small handmade businesses,
crafts and clothes and
toys were started precisely because of
putting children and their safety first. Making all these products and books illegal to sell -- forbidding these books to children already in difficult situations takes away another comfort from them. When there has not been one child harmed by a book containing lead, how is this thinking of children's safety, security, well-being, and comfort?
BUT I have to admit, in our home, pre-1985 books ARE for chewing, eating, tasting, drinking -- we feast on them every day and some times it is quite a banquet. My
personal collection of books began with books given to me by my grandfather when I was young (
this is one of them). My two daughters and I have continued to
build our home library the past 18+ years so we are surrounded by books. Those of you who feast on books yourselves won't need an explanation but for anyone wondering what that means, there is a simple, clearly defined explanation* at the bottom of my post. Through the years we've read many, many books -- wonderful books that nourish our souls with echoes of enduring and eternal ideas far more grand than our own. These books of stories, histories, lore, fables and tales have come from the mind-hearts of other people and entered inside us to touch our own mind-hearts. We've been introduced to people we would never have known, related to them and almost "know" them. We've been "stay-at-home travelers" and taken to places and times we've never been or ever will be able to go. Examples of the struggle between doing right or wrong and the consequence of each stir our emotions: we laugh with the silliness, rejoice at goodness, grieve with suffering, abhor and shun evil, become encouraged and directed to make our own moral choices of good and righteous works or take responsibility when we've failed to do so. The stories help us learn, freely and voluntarily, to have patience and sympathy and understanding with other people and their circumstances who are different than ourselves. Our storybooks and histories reflect our true selves; reveal our sins and imperfections, record our inability to measure up to the standard -- we fall far short -- not everything we’ve done has been noble. Reading and looking at both examples allows for precious moments, precious discussions, through the years, all for molding my daughter's character, teaching them to be either loving or hateful.
And there's more sustaining "dainties" from "drinking ink" and "eating pages" of our books: the events of our own lives become a part of the big picture and we feel connected to our family and other people. As I grew up reading, I found stories reinforced some of the very values my own parents conveyed to me. I, in turn, passed them on to my daughters. One such example is that as humans we experience tragic, painful, uncertain situations, it's nothing new. The characters the stories come through it sharing a commonality of suffering - depending on one another and helping one another. An example we, the readers, can take to heart and experience too. AND, for our family, we found in some of our stories that even through these situations there still is The Someone who remains the same, has ultimate authority and wisdom; who governs all of life, sustains structure and order in the events of all life and is working in our behalf because He loves us, because we love Him and seek His mercy. Because of this, life can be lived at its best even though we are not perfect human beings and life is not perfect. There's something far bigger, far more grand than this good but temporary life. What security and safety and comfort we have known from reading these nourishing books.
These "meals" of books have made us more aware we are important and do have a valuable part in the large "Story of Life" but in a way that governs and directs us out away from ourselves, away from self-absorption so we voluntarily wish to love and serve each other, our friends and neighbors. Some of the crumbs under the table have been even more tasty, feeding us with realization we don't have much original thought after all and that our greatest calling in life is to
"...do justly, to love mercy, to walk humbly..." --
in all areas of our lives, a continual day-by-day process, not having arrived -- all good lessons, making us hungry for more, to be related to and used in real, day-to-day life with our family, friends, and neighbors.
All these wonderful "dainties" found in books dated before 1985 -- all these books which are now illegal to sell -- at a time when the children could use these books most. They are going to be unavailable because of some unproven claim of harm from lead on pages -- all for children and their safety. Yes, there are other, newer books just as good but these older books are a part of us and our history too. Some can never be replaced once destroyed. These books are our precious gifts, to be read and enjoyed but will soon be lost forever unless this law is amended.
This is about the books, yes, and small businesses, BUT it is as equally about the CHILDREN because of what children get out of and find within these books, what remains a part of them forever. Don't children need to meet these people, travel to these places, find encouragement and inspiration to be all they were created to be? These very books and stories are gifts to help them with all this. We adults need them too. I know I do. Children
NEED these books and stories to be safe, secure, and protected. When will children be truly protected?
I love my two daughters. From the first day I held each of them in my arms, felt their breath on my cheek, and watched their tiny fingers wrap around my finger, I knew I would do all that is within my power to love them and protect them from harm. It was my desire to do so and something no one needed to tell me to do or how to do it. They were and still are my most precious gifts, unique and wonderful individuals, who have grown to be lovely young ladies. When they were young, I voluntarily decided which toys and items I allowed them to come in contact with or to keep from them if I thought unsafe. Most often it was the TINY easily broken toys and special items I didn't want broken. I most certainly never left them alone long enough to chew on items other than ones specifically designed for just that purpose. Now with more knowledge and awareness of toxic ingredients, I for one am certainly in agreement with protecting children from lead and phthalates. Even though my daughters are older and well beyond the "chewing stage", I think it is *my* responsibility to protect *my* daughters and would think myself negligent if I didn't.
One of the things I did TO PROTECT them when they were young was to give them good books filled with all these wonderful ideas to help them and nourish their souls. I read good books to them, with them, talked with them about the *IDEAS* within the stories -- some of these very books that are now illegal, which occupy our home. We still read together, we still talk about the ideas, it's something we rarely miss -- my daughters and I are less protected and less safe if these books and ideas are destroyed. Not only because the stories won't be available to us but because our government is taking them from us and I never ask them to. I am putting children, my daughters first, I am protecting my daughters now by sharing and voicing my opinion to amend this horrible law.
If it seems
this law can't possibly be used in a wrong way or preferentially to select a particular business, group or person, consider that it is *already* able to be used incorrectly by the field investigators because it's been stated it's not likely that thrift shops will be a priority for enforcing the law, which means it's OK for the investigators to randomly pick and choose other businesses and booksellers they will enforce it on:
"...an item-by-item enforcement at thrift shops is unlikely to be an enforcement priority any time soon for the Consumer Product Safety Commission's 100 field investigators..." Forbes: Scrap The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act
So what will determine which cottage industries, which small businesses this pertains to? How will a small used book seller be sure his business won't be one of the priority businesses? How are children protected when these businesses will no longer have the material goods they need? How will parents protect and keep their children safe if they can't supply basic needs of their children that they had depended on the thrift and re-sell stores for? Why wasn't
this law designated for products specifically for children ages six and under, or for that matter three and under, those most prone to putting things in their mouths? Why are the things children need most being taken from them and declared illegal?
DeputyHeadmistress of The Common Room has her say about the
attempt to exploit actual children's deaths for the purpose of emotionally manipulating and marginalizing small business people, seamstresses, craftspeople, booksellers, and others opposed to the CPSIA.... Also see her current
CPSIA Wednesday and an update on the
sub-committees cancelling the meeting with Rick Woldenberg.
Tristan Benz writes about her concern of how this will
destroy our connection to our past and also shares her five favorites destroyed by CPSIA.
More info:
Children's Books In Dumpsters: Washington's Madness Continues,
Dr. Suess Meets The CPSIA,
For The Children?,
Death Warrants For Thousands Of Companies, and
here.
There's still time to
contact our representatives to encourage them to amend this law, to make it better so it can truly protect children and be a law we are confident in and proud of.
Senator Jim DeMint
introduced/sponsored his Senate version reform bill S.374 or
here. See
actual House version bill H.R.968 here or
H.R. 968. Also more info here:
United States Senator Jim DeMint.
The list of names below are the
members on the House Committee - they are the people to contact to tell that this bill can be fixed, amended, and made better - links are to their online email or twitter:
Sen. John Rockefeller [D-WV] Phone: 202.224.6472 Fax: 202.224.7665
Sen. Kay Hutchison [R-TX] Phone: 202.224.5922 Fax: 202.224.0776
Sen. Mark Begich [D-AK] Phone: 202.224.3004
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D-CA] Phone: 202.224.3553 Fax: 202.228.1338
Twitter:
Barbara_Boxer
Sen. Samuel Brownback [R-KS] Phone: 202.224.6521 Fax: 202.228.1265
Sen. Maria Cantwell [D-WA] Phone: 202.224.3441 Fax: 202.228.0514
Sen. Byron Dorgan [D-ND] Phone: 202.224-2551 Fax: 202.224.1193
Sen. John Ensign [R-NV] Phone: 202.224-6244 Fax: 202.228.2193
Twitter:
JohnEnsignSen. Daniel Inouye [D-HI] Phone: 202.224-3934 Fax: 202.224.3934
Sen. John Isakson [R-GA] Phone:
202.224.3643 Fax:
202.228.0724Sen. Mike Johanns [R-NE] Phone: 202.224.4224 Fax: 202.228.0436
Sen. John Kerry [D-MA] Phone: 202.224.2742 Fax: 202.224.8525
Sen. Amy Klobuchar [D-MN] Phone: 202.224.3244 Fax: 202.228.2186
Sen. Frank Lautenberg [D-NJ] Phone: 202.224-3224 Fax: 202.228.4054
Sen. Mel Martinez [R-FL] Phone: 202.224.3041 Fax: 202.228.5171
Twitter:
MelMartinezSen. Claire McCaskill [D-MO] Phone: 202.224.6154 Fax: 202.228.6326
Twitter:
clairecmcSen. Bill Nelson [D-FL] Phone: 202.224.5274 Fax: 202.228.2183
Sen. Mark Pryor [D-AR] Phone: 202.224.2353 Fax: 202.228.0908
Sen. Olympia Snowe [R-ME] Phone: 202.224.5344 Fax: 202.224.1946
Sen. John Thune [R-SD] Phone: 202.224.2321 Fax: 202.228.5429
Sen. Tom Udall [D-NM] Phone: 202.224.6621 Fax:
Twitter:
tomudall
Sen. Mark Warner [D-VA] Phone: 202.224.2023 Fax:202.224.6295
Twitter:
MarkWarner
Get your own real button from
Geek Details or
see here and Hat Tip to
5 kids and a dogThis is one of my favorite books,
A Cow in the House by Mabel Watts, illustrated by Katherine Evans, copyright 1956 Follett Publishing Company -- a short, simple story of a farmer and his wife who became uncomfortable in their small house and how they were able to make it large enough to their satisfaction and contentment. Farmer went to Grandpa Wiseman for help and advice and found an interesting solution to the problem. I won't tell the solution to their problem. I hope you can get the book and read it yourself. *IF* you still can, I don't know.



I've shared more of our favorite illegal to sell pre-1985 books (amend the CPSIA) here and here. This Mister Linky is a way for anyone to share their own "Favorite Pre-1985 Children's Books (CPSIA Illegal To Sell)" from a post at their personal blog or site. If there are memorable books that touched your heart and life and you wish to participate, after you've posted about your "Favorite Pre-1985 Children's Books (CPSIA Illegal To Sell)" (as many as you'd like) at your own blog/site then:
1. add your name
2. add the actual
*POST* url to your "Favorite Pre-1985 Children's Books (CPSIA Illegal To Sell)" post, not your main blog/site url
3. leave a comment (optional)
4. contact your representatives with phone call, email, and letters (strictly up to you and your conscience)
5. spread the word and tell others to share their favorite books here too
6. read and enjoy the precious gifts of "dainties bred in books"

"Sir, he hath never fed of the dainties
that are bred in a book;
he hath not eat paper, as it were;
he hath not drunk ink;
his intellect is not replenished."
~William Shakespeare~
(*explanation: of course we don't physically or literally eat or chew on books or drink ink but have done so only internally, in our mind-hearts.)